The beginnings of the phrase "the child knows best" came from an experiment by Ogden Lindsley while working in Skinner's lab. When an experiment in extinction occurred differently than predicted by the textbook, Skinner told Og, "The rat knows best! That's why we still have him in the experiment."

Here is an equal interval by ratio chart, showing Lindlsey's experimentation with versions of the chart.
Lindsley writes for the first time, "Laboratory research had proven rate to be more sensitive than percent correct and other less direct behavior measures." Lindsley, O. R. (1956). Operant conditioning methods applied to research in chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatric Research Reports, 5, 118-139.

Kelsia King
Schedules of Reinforcement


Planning began to fund and construct a center on behalf of handicapped children at the University of Washington.
Norris G. Haring accepted a position at the University of Kansas Medical Center as Educational Director of the Children’s Rehabilitation Unit.

Lindsley’s laboratory research showed “frequency to be 10 to 100 times more sensitive than percentage correct in recording the effects of drugs and different reinforcers on the behavior of psychotic and normal children and adults.” (p. 10)

This graph shows Lindsley’s graphing responses in the thousands and still acknowledging a zero, or no-count, response. It is an Add-Subtract graph with vertical axis showing Responses/Hour in Thousands (0 to 5 by 1s) by Experimental Sessions (660 to 780 by 20s) on horizontal axis, p. 52.
Lindsley, O. R. (1963). Free-operant conditioning and psychotherapy from Current Therapies, Vol III, Part II-Techniques of Psychotherapy (pp. 47-56) New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc.

Og delivers a lecture to the Workshop for Leadership Personnel in Mental Retardation, School of Education, Boston University, (March 11, 1963). This was the basis of “Direct Measurement and Prosthesis of Retarded Behavior” printed in the Journal of Education, Oct 1964, Vol. 147, 62-81
Ann Dell Warren travels to Kansas. “I…made the drive the summer of 1964 to Kansas in my beige Chrysler 4 door boat full of books, clothes and dreams of making a difference.”
Ogden Lindsley recruited Eric Haughton in Boston in the spring of 1964. Beatrice Barrett writes of encouraging Eric to work with Lindsley as opposed to working on his doctorate in England. Lindsley writes, “He [Eric] considered studying with Eysenck in England, but Eysenck’s interests were more clinical than educational.”
Lindsley writes of Acquisition and Maintenance Prostheses and presents four-component, Operant Behavioral Equations (EA-M-A-ES and S-R-K-C) that became the basis (Lindsley, 12 Sep 1997 & Lindsley, 1970) for the five component Is-Does Learning Plan Sheet (P-PE-M-A-AE and D-S-R-K-C) devised in 1970.

Ogden Goes to the University of Kansas

Nancy Hughes Lindsley stated that Kansas University Medical archive shows that Ogden’s hire date was 1 Jan 1965 as full professor in education, and that Ogden arrived at the KU medical center in January of 1965
Lindsley (2002) uses the Median Test and the Fisher Exact to test for probability. The process includes counting dots [the frequencies] above and below the overall median.
“Academic performance can be accelerated by chart display.” Lindsley, 1990 (p.12). Lois Cox, supervised by Thomas Caldwell, found that pupil academic performance frequencies increased when pupils displayed their charts.
Lois also found that fourth-grade children enjoyed computing and charting their own daily performance frequencies. (p. 12)
Caldwell, T. E. & Cox, L. (1966). Fourth-grade children tabulate, mark-score, and graph their daily arithmetic performances. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.
It was known as the Coach House for the motel it had been, but then it was refurbished into classrooms and offices.
The Coach House in 1965 was the first setting outside the Kansas Medical Center to practice Precision Teaching
"A strong want galvanized me into action in 1966 when a school teacher, a student in my graduate class, spent over 30 minutes describing her class project chart projected on the wall to the 28 other students in the class.
Then another class member asked how old the child was, and the teacher answered, "That isn't the child's behavior. That's my behavior!" Sitting in the back of the room, I thought, Wow! 30 minutes and we don't even know whose behavior it is! There is no way we can have chart based teaching using self made charts! We have got to have a standard chart! And SOON! Or, this class will disintegrate!

While Richard Whelan was not involved with the chart, he is the person who led to the development of the term “Precision Teaching.” Dick was in attendance at one of Ogden’s early education courses at the Children’s Rehabilitation Unit at the KU Med Center. During the class, Ogden was talking about COLAB (Common Language for the Analysis of Behavior) and its application to teaching. After the class, Dick and Ogden were talking and Dick said to Ogden, “What you are doing is teaching with precision.” Og paused, looked at Dick and said “Precision Teaching.”

The Chart at this date was too late for inclusion in Haughton’s October 1967 doctoral dissertation, but just in time to be published in Koenig’s December 1967 masters’ thesis. All future iterations of the Daily Graph, the Standard Behavior Chart, and, now, the Standard Celeration Chart stem from this grid and date(s).
At first, only frequencies were charted, and the zero frequency count-line placed off the grid was problematic. Nancy Johnson and Carl Koenig, noticing the distortion of the zero bounce and extreme asymmetry, brought Og into the discussion. It became apparent that the amount of behaving time was important and should be accounted for on the grid. The three determined the question mark could be used to represent a “recording floor.” They immediately dismissed the question mark convention, and the concept and definition of the floor (1/Time) materialized, “quickly.” The use of
the question mark for the recording floor was, Koenig stated, “only a brief moment.” The floor was established and a mark (dot or x) for zero was placed just below* it.
Starlins moved Precision Teaching into regular education, and pioneered daily one-minute timings and entire classrooms of primary graders charting at least two or three of their academic behaviors each day (Lindsley, 1986, 31 March). The Precision Teaching community quickly adopted the use of one-minute timings, including, though at first reluctantly, Lindsley
Haughton collaborates and consults with colleagues, state education departments and Great Falls, Montana project

University of Florida, Gainsville: piloted chart-based individualized instructional procedure (IIP) class for shaping the verbal behavior of graduate students.
Koenig has discussions about the three dimensions of behavior. We agreed that frequency was the first dimension of behavior and that the change in frequency (acceleration/deceleration) the second. Then we speculated about the third, the change in acceleration/deceleration [agility].
Eric Haughton took This Daily Graph to the University of Oregon classes. Koenig's master's thesis inclusion of the first version of the 6-cycle x 140 day chart. May be a draft, contains hand-printed lettering.
Koenig begins his doctoral program, resulting in his 5yr. Behavior Bank

Barrett receives her first lessons using the Daily Graph. Implies Haughton as her chart parent

Lindsley conducts the First Annual Short Course in How To Precisely Manage Behavior (3-7 June 1968) as a training service through Lindsley’s Behavior Research Company.
Lindsley (July 1968) announces the 6-cycle log by 140-consecutive calendar day graph in this 1968 transcription of his May 1967 lecture. "We are using a new kind of graph paper now, six-cycle semi-logarithmic to record behavior. With this type of paper, we can record behaviors of different frequencies and compare them. But when these cases were done, we didn’t have log paper."
Daily Graph used in the August Thurston County Cooperative Special Services staff training in Olympia, WA.
The Daily Chart Tracer (DCT-7) was introduced to accommodate analysis of data. DCT-7 is more translucent than the DG-7 and could be placed one-by-one over many DG-7s collecting trend lines, through tracing, with each passage.
Edwards and Edwards share their first complete fetal behavior development chart. They discovered all eight charts showed fetal movement frequencies varied but common in acceleration, maintenance, and deceleration across the time frame of fetal development.

Behavior Research Company (BRCo.) prints Accuracy Pair Plan Sheet (APPS-1).

Lindsley drafted and printed the Acceleration Finder, later called the Celeration Finder, sometime prior to the 1974 Price List (BRCo-CFM-3—meaning it is the 3rd version). Neely recalls scratching the “AC” letters off his Finder in 1972. The printed Acceleration Finder was created on clear Mylar with red print.
BRCo. Creates the Behavior Bank using an IBM 552 processor and 5 data bank forms. Over 11,000 projects are stored in the Bank from multiple fields.
Sally Slezak’s thesis is, “The first to use the term daily behavior chart to report acceleration as movements per minute per week and to use an acceleration finder [italics added].” (Lindsley, 1995, p. 12).
Haughton and Starlin introduce the Is-Does Plan Sheet in a revised Lindsley article
Lindsley conducts the Second Annual Short Course in "How To Precisely Manage Behavior".

Curtis and supervisor Lovitt discovered that higher academic response frequencies occurred when the students selected their own reward contingencies than when the teacher selected them.
Lindsley writes of what Slezak discovered, “Pupils with orthopedic handicaps can chart their own behaviors (p. 12). Sally Slezak, under Lindsley’s supervision, taught two different classes of children with orthopedic handicaps.

Duncan writes about 55 high school senior volunteers, who, "learned to analyze their selected behavior targets by recording and plotting daily rates of occurrence [using the Standard Behavior Graph]..."
Joe and Diane Edwards use Precision Teaching to complete their study of conditions affecting marriage relationships of 4 early married couples, including themselves.
State Special Education meeting in Yakima, Washington. Bill Hulten, Marilyn Cohen, and Ann Mingo from the Experimental Education Unit (EEU) of the UofWashington’s Child Development and Mental Retardation Center shared a student’s Is-Does plan sheet and progress using the Standard Behavior Chart. The chart had dots, X’s, recording floors, phases and trend lines with variances plainly visible.
Precision Teaching arrived in our vision just in time to fit into Management by Objectives training spearheaded by the State Special Education Department where
Starlin, completed his Oregon dissertation in June of 1970 and did not use the term, celeration. Morrey, who completed his dissertation in April 1970 did. Between late 1969 and early 1970, Lindsley coined the base word "celeration" and Morrey became privy to that in time for his 1970 April dissertation (or Morrey coined the word and Og adopted it.) At any rate, Morrey's dissertation is the first recorded use of the term, celeration, I could find.

Ann Duncan published one of the first Precision Teaching articles that taught Precision Management skills of inner behaviors to children.
Carl Binder provides a comprehensive history of behavioral science and fluency. He describes the potential that fluency-based approaches have to teaching complex human behavior.

FIT course covers fundamentals of instructional design grounded in principles of learning derived from behavioral science and behavior analytic research. Emphasizes applications of programmed instruction, personalized systems of instruction, precision teaching, direct instruction, teaching machines and inter-teaching for collegiate instruction.
https://www.celeration.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Kirsten-Abstract-and-Bio-2024.pdf
Spearheaded by Elle Kirsten, Compassionate Behavior Analysis systematically bridges the gap between Precision Teaching and Relational Frame Theory.
Kelly Ferris welcomes aspiring Precision Teachers into the fold by clearly explaining how fluency is mastery quantified. She describes how and when to assess for fluent outcomes, affectionately called RESA checks.

Amy Evans, Drew Bulla and Andrew Kieta completed the most current concept analysis of Precision Teaching to date that delineated the critical and variable feature of the Precision Teaching system of measurement.


Rick Kubina and colleagues compare linear and ratio graphical displays of data as they relate to visual analysis and decision making in practice.