Skip navigation linksCeleration.org
  Home
  About the society
  Membership
  List of members

Charting resources
  FAQs
  Charting tips
  SCListServ
  Links
  References
  Glossary

Features
  Articles
  PT conference
  List gems

web by Tom McCabe

The Standard Celeration Society

Promoting PT:
Chart Sharing in Teacher Education

Dr Rick Kubina, Assistant Professor at Clarion University, shares some wonderful data with the SCC listserv from a chart share with his Special Education students. Once again the effectiveness of the chart is demonstrated as a powerful tool, that not only directs teacher decision-making, but also students' learning.

Simmone Pogorzelski (SPogorzelski_AT_chilli.net.au [e-mail?])

From: Rick Kubina, Ph.D.
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 8.13 AM
To: SClistserv@lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Great Chart Share

Hello all,

At Clarion (University), we have a block of classes that students must take before their student teaching experience (we happen to call it "block" for lack of a better name). During block, students go to class for half the semester and in the second half they have two teaching experiences. The first is a three-week period of teaching in a classroom for students with mild and moderate disabilities. This is followed up by another three weeks of teaching in a classroom for students with severe and profound disabilities.

During my first semester I taught students how to use the Standard Celeration Chart (SCC) and how to do Precision Teaching (PT). At the end of that semester not one student tried to use PT or use the SCC. Well I figured I would fix that problem in the next semester by requiring students to chart a behavior in each class.

Today we had chart share and the block students (all 35 of them) shared some absolutely incredible charts! In fact I learned many things from this chart share:

  1. All students (Clarion student teachers, well actually, block students) shared a chart that showed progress. Yes, all 35 of them! That alone really impressed me.

  2. Some students said that the cooperating teachers liked the results so much that the cooperating teacher would continue charting. Talk about taking PT in through the back door of education!

All of the fantastic work the block students did occurred in just three short weeks! Following are some of the data they shared from charts with their students:

  • One chart for a student with autism showed that as correctly placed pegs in a peg board (student wanted to improve fine motor control) accelerated (x1.4) the frequency of the student saying "no" decelerated (/2). This chart blew me away. The faster (and more fluent) the student became the less he said no and resisted the task.

  • One little boy (6 years old) in a life skills classroom (a name we use in PA for students with disabilities who focus on life skills) learned to identify or recognize the numbers 1-10. Now this doesn't seem like a big deal but before the block student starting working with this child in April, he could only identify the numbers 1 to 4. In other words, since the beginning of school, which started in September of 1999, this child could only identify 4 numbers from almost 7 months of instruction. In 3 brief weeks this block student got that kid fluent on identifying numbers. Our class cheered after he presented his chart.

  • Two block students shared charts that showed x4 acceleration!

  • One block student showed errors that decelerated by x8. What a rapid deceleration!

  • Four charts showed the same effects of changing practice sheets to learn a skill (e.g., multiplication facts). Each of the block students (independent of each other as they each worked in separate classrooms) changed the practice sheet because they feared the students would "memorize" the answers. This had the effect of creating a large degree of bounce (X3 and greater) and a lower celeration (from x1.1 to x1.2).

  • Block students charted a variety of academic skills such as line segments, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, oral reading, and sight words. They also charted social behaviors like "appropriate and inappropriate interaction behaviors." Last, motoric behaviors, such as cutting paper and placing pegs in a peg-board (and sorting big objects and small objects) also appeared on the chart. The students served ranged from 6 years old to 18 years old with varying disabilities.

After the block students shared their charts I could hear and see the excitement each of them had. I can't think of a more relevant way to get the chart into students' hands as well as producing very healthy learning.

The block students shared only one chart today and will write a brief report on the other chart (and turn them both in). I hope to share some more wonderful chart stories with you.

Sincerely,
Rick

Copyright 1999-2006© SCS. All rights reserved.
Last modified January 8, 2006. webmaster_AT_celeration.org [e-mail?]